dop replacement dop replacement Malaysia

  • dop replacement dop replacement Malaysia
  • dop replacement dop replacement Malaysia
  • dop replacement dop replacement Malaysia
  • Is MCCP a good replacement for DOP?
  • Interestingly MCCP is accepted by REACH specifications. MCCP with 52% chlorine is good. One such replacement is citrate-based plasticizer, but experience is that when CP is blended with it at the same level as in DOP, the CP migrates to the surface of product in due course.
  • Is DOP better than RoHS?
  • RoHS also has the same limits. In Japan it is less than 0.05% or 500 ppm. It is therefore necessary to use its cost-effective replacement, as good as DOP, possibly better that DOP, without causing health problems. Besides, it should be able to accept secondary plasticizer CP, without health hazard.
  • Why is DOP on its way out?
  • However, DOP is on its way out due to health concerns. The latest amendments now require all types of products containing the plasticizers BBP, DBP, DEHP, and DIBP to meet the requirements limiting the quantity of restricted phthalates in any item to less than 0.1% (1000 ppm) of the entire article’s composition.
  • Is DOP a good plasticizer?
  • Plasticizing efficiency of DOP is considered as “11”and efficiency all other plasticizers is evaluated with reference to DOP. Besides, cost of DOP based compound can be reduced by blending it with CPW of appropriate grade in appropriate proportion (70:30), without affecting quality of product. However, DOP is on its way out due to health concerns.
  • What is the difference between DOP and DINP?
  • DINP has a higher molecular weight and longer carbon chain, (Av. Molecular weight 418) as compared to DOP, molecular weight 390. This results in - a. Better aging performance, increasing product life. b. Better anti-migration performance, d. Higher high temperature resistance. e. Higher permanency and improved resistance for cold outdoor conditions
  • Does Di-isononyl phthalate (DINP) warrant classification for reprotoxic effects?
  • d. ECHA's Risk Assessment Committee (RAC) has concluded, on March 7, 2018, that Di-isononyl phthalate (DINP) does not warrant classification for reprotoxic effects under the EU's Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) regulation.

Recommended hot-selling products